In the U.S., thousands of women have sued the company over talc-based Baby Powder. The lawsuits are seeking $3.5 billion in damages for the health of children. The lawsuits also allege that the company knowingly concealed the risk of talc exposure through their marketing. Despite the mounting evidence, J&J has not fully retracted its decision to remove the product from store shelves.
In a memo to the company's employees, J&J executives acknowledged the adverse publicity surrounding talc. But the firm also recommended increasing marketing to Hispanic and Black women. But now, health, environmental, and consumer groups are demanding that the company recall and remove all talc-based baby powder from the global market and stop marketing it to these communities.
While the company stopped selling new talc-based baby powder in the US, it will continue selling it in other parts of the world. The company has received nearly 200 lawsuits and is appealing the majority of them. The talc in baby powder is known to be contaminated with asbestos, which can lead to lung and ovarian cancer. It's also harmful to the environment.
A study conducted by Dartmouth College in 1974 found that talc contained traces of asbestos, which the company didn't disclose to the FDA. The professor attributed the exposure to the talc to the "fiberform" mineral actinolite. However, the study did not find any link between talc and asbestos. The researchers also concluded that the talc-based product was contaminated with tremolite. Trying a lot of visit Johnson & Johnson Recalls and Removes Talc-Based BabyPowder
In 2018, J&J received the largest lawsuit award in US history. The award included the names of 22 women who suffered from the alleged risk of cancer from exposure to talc-based baby powder. In addition, the company's lawsuits were settled after a jury awarded $4.7 billion to 22 plaintiffs. Despite the recent controversy, the manufacturer's talc-based baby powder has been in the market for decades and is currently safe to use today.
A report commissioned by the F.D.A. says that talc is not asbestos-based. But the company admitted that a significant amount of asbestos was present in its baby powder from the 1970s to the early 2000s. The company did not disclose this information to consumers. The firm has also been sued by the government of India over the claims. The lawsuits have resulted in the suspension of Johnson &s operations.
While Johnson &s talc-based baby powder was once considered safe, the company has been forced to recall it and discontinue shipping. It has subsequently settled with plaintiffs over its misrepresentations that talc contained asbestos. Despite the claims, the lawsuits remain ongoing. The company also faces several dozens of other lawsuits claiming talc-based baby powder caused cancer.
0 comentários:
Post a Comment